If Apple’s Siri [personal assistant] works as promised, then it is going to be one of the all-time great innovations.
But most of us Mac junkies didn’t pay much attention. Why? We’ve had Dragon Dictate, et al around for years, and so our expectations for Siri’s competence hover somewhere down near Hell. Maybe she (why not a he voice?) won’t understand women’s voices as well as she understands men’s — like Dragon. Like me, too, that’s why I wear hearing aids. And that’s why I’m glad Dragon is getting better after all that iPad/iPhone data farming it’s done, but it still hits about 87-94% accuracy for me. 94 is tolerable; 87 makes me as nuts as AT&T’s dropped/gone-mute calls.
Experience with Google’s voice recognition probably makes people even more suspicious about claims for Siri. Google sounds pretty lousy, to judge by Gene Weingarten’s column in last Sunday’s WPost:
“Because he is a modern man, my editor, Tom the Butcher, enthusiastically avails himself of new technologies such as Google’s voice-recognition system for phone and computer. Now, when Tom gets a voicemail message on his phone, he not only receives an e-mail alert but also reads the message itself as an e-mail sent to him by Google. And thus it is that, at 4:16 PM on September 13, Tom was alerted to the fact that I had left him this voicemail:
“’Hey, your ass is in the Interest River.’
“I often say odd things to Tom, but this seemed a little too odd. So he then listened to the original voicemail. What I actually said was:
“’Hey, ask me about the tree-trimmer.”
“Yes, indeed. It turns out Google’s vaunted voice-recognition software may be the most comically misbegotten invention since a man named Hans Laube patented something named Smell-Oh-Vision…..
Unless…Siri actually understands me!
I’ll find out Friday.